Many today have a poor definition of what is "loving" or "kind". Neither necessitate softly spoken words or handling (while often these are applicable, they are not not always necessary or possible). 

Being kind and loving in a biblical sense is doing what is necessary, even if painful for one or both parties. 

Ask any field medic, EMT, soldier, fireman, LE Officer, even ask yourself. You know this to be true.

Warning people about their eternal destiny in Hell and pleading with them to turn from they're sin to Christ as their only hope for salvation, is ALWAYS KIND AND LOVING.

Please friends, let us all purpose in or hearts to share the gospel with those God places in our path. If at all possible be soft in speech. Yet, always remember the gospel is a hard truth that must be shared if we ever hope for people to be saved. 

No sane person, yanked from sleep out of their bed in the midst out a burning house, would ever turn on the fireman who saved them, complaining that they were rudely woken up from sleep and jostled about in an unloving or unkind way.

Remember the words of scripture. Go into the highways and byways and COMPEL them to come in. and, Snatch them from the flames! 

God bless you as you reach out to the lost even when it hurts!

You may be asking yourself, “Why bother taking the time to rehash something like this?” First, I definitely believe our representation of doctrine has practical effects on our ministry to the saints. They can be either beneficial or disastrous. However, I don't see the necessity of proper doctrine as primary for that reason. Primarily we strive to have sound doctrine to rightly love, worship, and represent God. I believe Jer. 9:23-24 and 2 Tim. 2:15 describe why we should strive for having sound doctrine. Namely that the only thing we should ever boast in is God and our gracious ability to know Him. As Christians we are able to do this through Holy Spirit empowered and diligent Bible study. These verses show that the reason to have right doctrine is to know and be approved by our gracious and loving God.

First I want to lay out the three main ways Christ's propitiatory work on Calvary are described. In the end only one can be biblical and thus right.

The first way might be best described like this. Christ's propitiation for sin was universally offered as payment for the sins of everyone but is only effectual for those who freely choose to receive the payment.

The second description could be stated like this. Christ's propitiation effectually paid for the sins of all those it was appointed for.

The third description may best be stated this way. Christ's propitiation was universally effectual for all of humanity and thus all people's sins have been paid for.

Now depending on your soteriological stance you will probably quickly align yourself with either the first or second option above. Some may even try to say they ascribe to both option one and two. However, no orthodox Christian would subscribe to option three as it is simple Universalism and thus heresy.

So by now everyone reading this probably ascribes to either option one, two, or some hybrid of both. By the end of this article I think we will all see which of the two views is indeed the biblical view, and as such the only right view.

Let me start off by making a bold claim. I believe that any orthodox Christians' reading this are already on the same page. I know, bold right? Please bear with me. I think that no matter what soteriological position you hold (Calvinistic, Arminian, or some mix you hold to.) you're already in agreement and just need some biblical clarification to see that as the case.

I'm going to tackle this by laying out biblical terms, define them biblically, and then examine the biblically described result. I don't think I can do it any safer than that.

OK, so first let's define our terms. Of course if we're talking about propitiation we had better define it biblically. In the NKJV we see the term used specifically four times. For the sake of saving you time checking them against each other, and to be complete, I'm going to copy out all four verses and the respective Strong's Greek definitions.

1. “whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed,” Rom. 3:25

Propitiation – Hilastērion: Neuter Noun

1) relating to an appeasing or expiating, having placating or expiating force, expiatory; a means of appeasing or expiating, a propitiation

a) used of the cover of the ark of the covenant in the Holy of Holies, which was sprinkled with the blood of the expiatory victim on the annual day of atonement (this rite signifying that the life of the people, the loss of which they had merited by their sins, was offered to God in the blood as the life of the victim, and that God by this ceremony was appeased and their sins expiated); hence the lid of expiation, the propitiatory

b) an expiatory sacrifice c) a expiatory victim

2. “Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people.” Heb. 2:17

Propitiation – Hilaskomai: Verb

1) to render one's self, to appease, conciliate to one's self

a) to become propitious, be placated or appeased

b) to be propitious, be gracious, be merciful

2) to expiate, make propitiation for

As a quick note the last 2 verses use the exact same greek word for propitiation. So I will list the 3rd and 4th verses and then list the definition.

3. “And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world.” 1 John 2:2

4. “In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.” 1 John 4:10

Propitiation – Hilasmos: Masculine Noun

1) an appeasing, propitiating 2) the means of appeasing, a propitiation

I hope we can all agree that the only major difference in these terms is their respective usage, ie. verb, noun, etc. So now that we've looked at all the verses, I'm going to try to summarize propitiation for us in a way that fits the three different greek words here.

Propitiation is the merciful and gracious appeasement of God's wrath against sin, paid for and absorbed in totality, by Christ on the cross.

I believe that if we honestly adhere to the biblical definition of propitiation we already must admit which of the remaining two possible definitions is the right one.

You'll remember how I boldly said at the beginning that I believed all orthodox Christians already agree about what is meant by Christ's propitiatory work.

So I'm going to make a declaration now and then elaborate on my reasons for the declaration. Be assured that the reasoning flows from the biblical definitions above. As such, it is the biblical definitions above that dictate my belief regarding propitiation, and not vice versa.

That said, the biblical, and thus correct way to understand propitiation is, option two. Let's spell it out again here for review.

Christ's propitiation effectually paid for the sins of all those it was appointed for.

So first, a very short answer. In light of the biblical definitions we see above we must agree that the propitiatory work of Christ was an effectual work and not a conditional work. So now let's get into some more detailed reasoning that I hope will help us clear up any confusion.

Let's start with simple grammar. As we've seen above the propitiation of our sin in Christ is a done deal. Three word's from Jesus ring true and amazingly gracious to our ears: “It is finished.”

Everything we read in scripture and everything we've covered here in this short article makes it clear. Those of us who are in Christ have had our sins propitiated by Christ. Jesus both paid for our sins and suffered God's wrath in our place, on the cross!

That truth is so important to understand! No one who has partaken of Christ's propitiatory work can ever suffer an ounce of God's wrath! Paul proclaims it to us so beautifully!

“For God did not appoint us to wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ,” 1 Thess. 5:9

Again, the mere black and white definition of propitiation makes it clear. Those who have received Christ have received the full benefits of His propitiatory work. Praise God for that!

So now let's move on to some logical conclusions based on these biblical truth's. We've established that those who have had their sins propitiated cannot be held accountable anymore for them. In short, they have been saved!

Yet, we all agree that not everyone is saved. Therefore, since everyone is not saved, Christ's propitiatory work could not be universal or conditional.

Propitiation cannot be universal because the Bible clearly teaches that all people are not saved(That's a whole other book to write!).

Propitiation cannot be conditional because it's very definition is of an effectual, finished work.

Last but definitely not least here I want to deal with the righteousness of propitiation. This is very important. We have to understand this.

Christ's propitiatory work was not only(or even primarily)because we needed it for salvation. Though we are very happy for that! That may sound shocking but the following scriptures make it abundantly clear that it is truth.

“But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe. For there is no difference; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed, to demonstrate at the present time His righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.” Rom. 3:21-26

Friends, do you see the picture here? It would be absolutely scandalous to think that God would punish every sinner from creation to the cross in Hell and yet pass over the sins of His people by simply sacrificing animals! No animal sacrifice could ever pay for someone's sin and no soulless animal could suffer God's wrath for someone's sin!

For a man's sin to be paid, a man's blood must be shed. For the eternal God's wrath against a man to be appeased, the eternal soul of the man must suffer eternally. No animal could accomplish this!

So for God's righteousness and justice to be established unquestionably, the sinful man must pay his debt in blood and eternal suffering!

Now here is what boggles our minds and I believe will do so forever.

“In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.” 1 John 4:10

Only Christ as a man could pay the blood debt of men. Only Christ as eternal God could propitiate in Himself the full measure of God's eternal wrath and yet rise again!

Absolutely mind boggling and amazing love! I look forward to singing praises for eternity to God who loved me and saved me by His grace and good pleasure. All according the unfathomable yet perfect counsel of His own will in spite of my wretchedness! Praise be to God!

I want to tackle one more issue of justice in Christ's propitiatory work before closing up. In doing so I'm going to ask you to think on your personal sin for a moment.

As Christian's I think it is safe to say that when we think about any of our sins, great or small, we are all grieved by them. This does not take away from our knowledge that they are forgiven yet it does none the less pain us to know we helped place Christ on the cross we deserve.

Yet, even at our most humble, in our most grieved moments over our sin, we never see the full affront that it is to God. Yet for Christ it was not so.

On that cross, the Godman knew the full affront each and every one of our sins were to God. In full knowledge of them, yet with no part in them, Christ propitiated every single one of them. Not for us alone, but for all that believe!

I constantly think of that worship song line that says: “I'll never know how much it cost, to see my sin upon that cross!” As abhorrent as I know that my sin is, I can't begin to fathom their true depths! What I do know is that Christ does know. He did know in eternity past before He ever made me. Yet, He made me anyway, and grace upon grace still saved me!

Now assuming that you have a similar view of your own sin, think about this.

In light of God's righteousness and justice this last very important detail cannot be overlooked.

It is not possible for God to hold two people accountable for sin. It would be completely unjust for God to exact universal propitiation on Christ for an unrepentant sinner and then exact payment and pour out punishment on the sinner as well.

Despite the fact that by definition, universal propitiation would eliminate the possibility of the unrepentant sinner paying for and being punished for sin. Think about it. Why would the sinner have to pay for what Christ already paid? Now emotionally we would still see the justice of people paying for and being punished for their unrepentant sin. Yet in light of the biblical definition of propitiation it just won't work.

However, all of us would have to decry the injustice of Christ shedding His blood and suffering God's wrath for every filthy, painful sin, of every unrepentant sinner in history! All for nothing! This cannot be so! Do you really believe He paid the price of even the sinners who were already suffering for their sins in Hades? It makes no more sense that He'd knowingly do so for those who He knows will end up there after the cross either!

Sadly, it is the above conclusions that have driven some to embrace the heresy of Open Theism. They can't escape the plain truth of propitiation(Since it is necessary for anyone to be saved.),so they trade off the true God of sovereign omniscience for a god of hopeful ignorance.

Christ's propitiatory work was not universal and thus we should not present it as such. To do so misrepresents the God of the Bible and misleads man.

Let me make some closing remarks in light of how Christians' differing views of soteriology may cause some discomfort. I did not skirt on my promise that any orthodox Christian will be able to agree in the end.

We all believe that God is omniscient and thus has perfect knowledge of all things including time. So, whether your soteriology embraces the libertarian free will of man or the sovereign free grace of God, we can all agree that God's knowledge of those for whom Christ's propitiatory sacrifice was made(the elect)is perfect. God's undeniable omniscience makes any other conclusion impossible.

As such it is biblically right to boldly proclaim that His propitiatory work was individually and perfectly effective for all and only those who have obeyed Christ's command to, “...Repent, and believe in the Gospel.” 

God bless and thanks for reading and sharing!   

Welcome to CORE Issues! This is where I hope to address issues as they pertain to Evangelism in general and CORE ministries specifically. I don't know exactly how wide we'll range in topics, but most will be issues that arise due to peoples questions, comments, and concerns.

At other times I'll just be sharing what's on my heart and mind. Most often even these issues are going to stay mostly in the realm of evangelism as that is what CORE is mostly about. However, I'll probably address general theology issues and social concerns as they relate to the church today as well.

In the past I've posted some lengthy things on Facebook addressing issues and concerns but they kind of roll by and are gone after a short time Sometimes I'd like to be able to point someone to something I addressed but it is long gone by the time I want to do so. This way you and I both can keep track of what I've spouted off about!

In the end my first priority here(as in everything else)is to glorify God. After that I hope the blog will be a resource that blesses you and furthers your walk with God.

Please feel free to make comments here, in Facebook, email me, etc. Your ideas and overall input will be a major fuel source for this blog. God bless and thanks for your prayers!

(Quick note: I had to revise the title because while this started off as an answer to a concern about Gospel Banners, this post turned into a teaching on the wider issue of evangelism as a whole. So please be patient you'll be here a while, but I hope you'll be blessed.)

I recently heard from a brother some concerns he had with the use of Gospel banners. It seems some friends and relatives of his were angered and/or embarrassed by Gospel Banners they saw CORE using in a recent Classic Car cruise. I don't know how well you can see them but all the major banners we use are shown in the picture conglomerate in the upper left. So, from here on out at least you'll know the context of the complaints and concerns.

However, the concern this brother had was different. His concern was that he didn't see these as Biblical and felt they were impersonal. I had never heard that issue raised before. I was thankful that he brought it up because it caused me to prayerfully consider his concern in light of scripture.

Let me start off by saying this brother is a solid believer who loves the Lord. He's even accompanied me when I preached the gospel in the open air. He is not just an evangelism "Nay Sayer". His concern is legitimate, so I want to address it here for him and anyone else who may be thinking the same thing.

First and short. Are Gospel banners "biblical"? Of course first we have to ask: How do we mean, "biblical"? Obviously we don't hear of John the Baptist or any disciples carrying gospel banners or any other biblical characters I'm aware of. Of course we know that isn't what people are driving at. At least I hope not. If so giving away gospel tracts and even copies of the Bible itself would be unbiblical by that criteria!

So, really what we have to determine for being biblical, is whether or not the content is biblically sound. I will be the first to admit that I am appalled at what some "Street Evangelists" consider appropriate banners or signs. I personally believe that unless the banner uses language that properly depicts a biblical stance both in language and heart it is a bad banner. Of course the easiest banners to be safe are just those that quote scripture. However, often for the sake of space a banner may be a summation of a biblical truth that points people to  Christ. Most of our banners are in that light. 

I see banners like very short gospel tracts. They need to call out peoples sins and point them to the savior from sin in as short and as powerful a way as possible. They must do so for the glory of God and for the potential salvation of the readers soul. If a banner does not carry these elements I can't really call them a, "Gospel Banner". 

(As a quick aside, all the tall banners on poles come to our ministry from before CORE even existed. They aren't even necessarily the banners I would have created. However, I approve of them and their messages. The only banner in the pictures you see that I created is the long CORE banner with both scripture and commentary.)

We could go deep into the theology of messages but I think I've covered the basics as to the biblical appropriateness of a Gospel Banner. So let's move on to my friend's concern regarding whether they are "personal". 

Like the term "Biblical", the term "personal", could have various and sundry definitions. So for the sake of this blog I'm going to address the term, "personal", in light of my friend's concerns. 

He mentioned to me that he saw the preaching that John the Baptist, Jesus, and the Apostles used in sharing the gospel as both biblical and personal. As the person to person interaction opened the door for questions and dialogue on top of the preachers monologue. I definitely agree with this and even experienced the reality of very personal dialogue and debate today. Another brother and I had the opportunity to preach in the open air as well as chat one on one and tract at the Cranberry Festival in Bandon Oregon. This led to some very interesting and fruitful interaction!

So, by this definition of "personal", I agree that banners lack the one on one interaction my friend sees as appropriate. Now, I think I can clear this objection up as to whether or not this definition of "personal", should be a measure of the appropriateness of Gospel Banners pretty quickly. Let's look at some other ministry tools(some mentioned earlier above)that fall outside of this definition of, "personal". 

Shirts - Many Christians wear them and they are little different than Gospel banners in their effect(Except they usually do not present a very good Gospel message. In fact they're often silly or even embarassing!). 

Bumper Stickers - See "Shirts" above!

Gospel Tracts - As I mentioned above, Gospel Banners are really just short Gospel Tracts. They are equally impersonal.

Preaching - Yes, even preaching can be very impersonal. While tone, length of message, and even modeling the message for the current crowd may add a modicum of customization for them specifically, overall there is little interaction in most cases and the message is impersonal by the standard we're going by here.

The Bible - Yes, I know it may sound crazy, but even giving someone a Bible is impersonal by our standard without one to one interaction. Often times Bibles can be found destroyed or trashed or in second hand stores dropped off unread. 

So, after all that is said let me give a quick summary statement and then go on to flesh out some other thoughts regarding the issue. 

In short, no matter what the medium in the evangelism scenario, without at least two engaged participants in the scenario, the scenario is not "personal" by our definition here.

Now, I want to try to define what I see as, "personal". First let me say I believe all evangelism should be personal. In fact, any true evangelism must be personal. I say "must", because all true evangelism involves at least four persons. God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit and last and definitely least, me! Without this very personal foundation for our evangelism any numbers other than these, no matter how great, are empty.

So first let's make sure we have the right reasons for our evangelism. If we do then our evangelism will be personal. 

First in evangelism and in all areas of life we must do what we do for the glory of God. If we approach our evangelism with a heart that loves God we will evangelize in a manner that brings praise, honor, and glory to His name! 

Secondly, if we love the lost people who are headed for the same eternal Hell that we deserve, we will cry out to them passionately and personally to repent and turn to their only possible savior, the Lord Jesus Christ! 

Now we know the goals we are aiming for. So how can we use Gospel Banners(or any other evangelistic medium)usefully to attain them? To do that we must make clear what the specific purpose of evangelism is. 

Evangelism's specific purpose is this: To call all sinners, everywhere, to give due glory to God for the amazingly gracious sacrifice of His only begotten Son, for the salvation of His people. They begin their life of giving glory to God by humbling themselves, repenting of sin, and trusting in Christ alone to faithfully and lovingly wash them from all their sin, seal and sanctify them by the Holy Spirit, and present them as His spotless Bride to the Father in Heaven. 

In short, our goal is to see God glorified in His saving sinners through by the proclamation of the Gospel!  

Now how can Gospel Banners or any other medium accomplish such a lofty goal? In and of themselves they will utterly fail. Yet, God promises that He will use  preaching(The proclamation of His saving Gospel!)in any medium listed above, to save sinners! Don't take my word for it take God's

"For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it is written, “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.” Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe. For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men." 1 Cor. 1:18-25

"For the Scripture says, “Everyone who believes in him will not be put to shame.” For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, bestowing his riches on all who call on him. For “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.” How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? And how are they to preach unless they are sent? As it is written, “How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!”But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed what he has heard from us?” So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ." Rom. 10:11-17

So, in the end friends we only need to concern ourselves with a few things in evangelism. We need to be sure that our motives, mediums and the what we manifest to God and man, are God glorifying as defined by His word. 

You see, we really only need to concern ourselves in whether or not our lives glorify God. If we obey the first command to love God with all our heart, mind, soul, and strength, the second command to love our neighbor as ourselves will be inevitable. As we love God and are so thankful for being saved from the Hell that we deserve, we will want our neighbors to likewise love God and be thankful for being saved from Hell as well. So the fruit of that will be that our Gospel Banners and every other evangelistic tool we use will be dedicated to that end.

Be confident friends! The Apostle Paul told the Corinthians(1 Cor. 3)the truth of Gospel preaching in a nutshell. Some plant seeds, and others water them, but it is God that brings the increase!  He will indeed bring the increase! Let us settle for no less than the authority of the spoken words of our Lord Jesus Christ on this!

"The sower sows the word. And these are the ones by the wayside where the word is sown. When they hear, Satan comes immediately and takes away the word that was sown in their hearts. These likewise are the ones sown on stony ground who, when they hear the word, immediately receive it with gladness; and they have no root in themselves, and so endure only for a time. Afterward, when tribulation or persecution arises for the word’s sake, immediately they stumble. Now these are the ones sown among thorns; they are the ones who hear the word, and the cares of this world, the deceitfulness of riches, and the desires for other things entering in choke the word, and it becomes unfruitful.  But these are the ones sown on good ground, those who hear the word, accept it, and bear fruit: some thirtyfold, some sixty, and some a hundred.” Mk. 4:14-20

Take heart friends! Jesus has promised that though many will not be saved, some definitely will! Those who are will not only be saved but will produce fruit to the glory of God! 

"And let us not grow weary while doing good, for in due season we shall reap if we do not lose heart." Gal. 6:9

God bless and thanks for reading!